Adirondack Forum  
Rules Membership Donations and Online Store Adkhighpeaks Foundation ADKhighpeaks Forums ADKhighpeaks Wiki Disclaimer

Go Back   Adirondack Forum > The Adirondack Forum > General Adirondack Discussion
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-04-2022, 02:29 PM   #1
saabrian
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 154
Adks not the only place figuring out how to deal with irresponsible climbers

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/m...sit/index.html
__________________
Successful ascents: 136 (81 different) as of 7/30/22
Adirondack/Catskill fire tower challenge: 13/31
Adk 29er challenge: 11/29

Completed: Chester Challenge, Tupper Lake Triad, Hamilton County Waterfall
saabrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2022, 07:55 PM   #2
Bunchberry
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 91
"contempt"

"The municipality of Saint-Gervais plans to take measures adapted to the irresponsibility of some and the risks they make rescuers run"

"pseudo-mountain-climbers"
Bunchberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2022, 08:54 PM   #3
TCD
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,001
The central point:

"risks they MAKE rescuers run" (emphasis mine).

No one "makes" you do anything. If rescue agencies have a problem, stop rescuing.
TCD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2022, 10:29 AM   #4
saabrian
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 154
TCD: The job of first responders is to help those in need. Not to cast moral judgment on the decisions that led up to said need. I believe that obligation is a legally binding one when first responders are on duty.

How about flipping the script? If you get hurt on the trail through your own irresponsibility, you are under no obligation to call 9-1-1.
__________________
Successful ascents: 136 (81 different) as of 7/30/22
Adirondack/Catskill fire tower challenge: 13/31
Adk 29er challenge: 11/29

Completed: Chester Challenge, Tupper Lake Triad, Hamilton County Waterfall
saabrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2022, 05:30 PM   #5
TCD
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by saabrian View Post
How about flipping the script? If you get hurt on the trail through your own irresponsibility, you are under no obligation to call 9-1-1.
Absolutely true! Of course these days, we have people who call 911 because they are tired, and then feign an injury in order to get a ride out of the woods.

We've had a bunch of threads about this stuff on the various forums. Lots of opinions! Rescues do cost a lot of money, and involve risk; and governments (and taxpayers) don't necessarily want to fund that.

My point in the earlier post is that it's unfair to responders to put them in a situation where there is a lot of risk and obligation, but inadequate funding. Of course the responders feel an obligation when they are on duty. But that obligation is created by the laws of the government, and the policies of the rescue agencies. That's where the change needs to happen.
TCD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2022, 08:41 AM   #6
tgoodwin
Member
 
tgoodwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Keene, New York
Posts: 334
This isn't the first article I've seen about irresponsible climbers on Mt. Blanc. St. Gervais is at the base of a cog railway that goes a long way up the mountain toward the Gouter Hut, which is on the 'easiest' route to the summit. The earlier article referenced climbers putting on crampons for the first time ever when they reached the first snow.

Years ago, I climbed the 'death couloir' to get to the hut. It was also during an abnormally hot summer, and I (and the other climbers) periodically had to take shelter under ledges to let a volley of rocks roll over us. The next day, walking on snow was much easier, and we we descended early enough that rock fall wasn't much of a problem.

I climbed with a British lad who was in great physical shape, but had never been at altitude while I had been at altitude on several trips to the Rockies plus had just hiked the Tour do Mt. Blanc with my then-future wife. I managed to urge my companion on until about the 14,500-foot level. By that time I had seen enough solo climbers that I left him and made the final 1,200 feet to the summit.
__________________
Every time that wheel turns round, bound to measure just a little more ground.
tgoodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

DISCLAIMER: Use of these forums, and information found herein, is at your own risk. Use of this site by members and non-members alike is only granted by the adkhighpeak.com administration provided the terms and conditions found in the FULL DISCLAIMER have been read. Continued use of this site implies that you have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions of this site. Any questions can be directed to the Administrator of this site.