Trail Measuring

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mike1889
    wish I was in the Adks
    • Nov 2003
    • 269

    #1

    Trail Measuring

    On another thread recently, someone asked how the Saddleback cliffs could be measured with a wheel. I asked Tony Goodwin about it and he sent me an intereting reply that I thought was worth passing along. This explains why many of the distances on the signs don't match what is in the guidebook. Tony has been the Editor of the ADK High Peaks guidebook for the past several editions and has measured all the trails in the High Peaks.


    "As for the cliffs on Saddleback, I measured the trail going down and just did the best I could to keep the wheel in contact with the rock. It actually wasn't that hard, and I don't think I came out much different from what someone would have gotten with a long tape. Furthermore, in that terrain exact mileage is hardly the most important factor in determining difficulty.

    As for the discrepancies (almost always shorter than the ADK guide) in distances on the DEC signs, I determined during my first round of measuring in 1984 that the DEC had used the same type of wheel I was using but didn't know what it was measuring. The surveyor's wheel is best for rough terrain because it has a larger diameter than most other wheels. The only problem is that it measures in the arcane unit of chains. (1 chain = 66 feet = 80 chains to the mile.) (Also: 1 rod = 16.5 feet = 4 rods per chain - aren't you glad you asked?) Anyway, the wheel measures 1/10th of a chain or 6.6 feet = 800 revolutions per mile. The inaccuracies came from someone thinking that the wheel was measuring in fractions of a mile and that one revolution = 5.28 feet or 1,000 revolutions to the mile.

    I had always wondered how the new (1974) trail from the Loj to Marcy Dam was said to be 1.8 mi. on the main DEC sign when it was clear that the new route was longer than the original route that was 2.1 mi. I guessed that this was perhaps a way of getting hikers to use the new trail. In working on the guide in 1984, I measured from Upper Works to Calamity lean-tos. At the junction there was a new DEC sign proclaiming that it was 3.7 mi. to Upper Works. The counter on the wheel showed just over 3,700 revolutions - aha! The next day I measured to Marcy Dam and it came out just over 1,800 revolutions - case closed in my book.

    I didn't go into such detail in the intro to the guide, but since you asked, now you know; and you're welcome to pass this information along.

    Best Regards,

    Tony Goodwin"
  • Kevin
    **BANNED**
    • Nov 2003
    • 5857

    #2
    That explains some of the discrepencies I've seen/experienced .

    Comment

    • Mavs00
      I am the sith
      • Nov 2007
      • 46

      #3
      I think I was the one that replied "about the wheel'. I had remembered something about it being involved, but no specifics. Iit's great to get the FULL story.

      Glad we have someone like you around Mike (who can just tug on the esteemed ear of Mr. Goodwin for answers). The way the community doesn't have to rely on information from dummies like me

      Thanks Mike (and Tony), great stuff and I still say, I'd hate to push that thing around in front of me all day.
      "I can feel your anger. It gives you focus. It makes you stronger. " Supreme Chancellor

      Comment

      • oldsmores
        Member
        • Nov 2003
        • 440

        #4
        Originally posted by Mavs00
        ...Thanks Mike (and Tony), great stuff and I still say, I'd hate to push that thing around in front of me all day.
        I agree with Mavs and we should all be grateful that someone is willing to do all that work. If the distances aren't perfect, oh well... I always take them with a grain of salt anyway.
        Now, if someone could explain why both the signs and the guidebook seem to overestimate distances in the morning and underestimate them later in the day...

        Comment

        • Neil
          Admin

          • May 2004
          • 6129

          #5
          This is a good time to ask this. Mavs00, what is your formula for estimating time required to hike a section of trail. It factors in both distance and vertical ascent.
          The best, the most successful adventurer, is the one having the most fun.

          Comment

          • Kevin
            **BANNED**
            • Nov 2003
            • 5857

            #6
            Originally posted by Neil
            This is a good time to ask this. Mavs00, what is your formula for estimating time required to hike a section of trail. It factors in both distance and vertical ascent.
            Well, I'm not Mavs but I figure I'd share an answer I was given recently by an experienced hiker...

            1.5 miles an hour seems to work itself out for the overall trip (considering faster decents and slower ascents). For ascents they say to add an hour per 1,000 feet or something like that, but then we get into too many variables (trail conditions, individual fitness and/or hiking speed, etc). I usually just estimate the entire trip at 1.5 miles and hour, realizing the ascent will be slower (and 2/3 of the trip time will be making the summit).

            Comment

            • redhawk
              Senior Resident Curmudgeon
              • Jan 2004
              • 10929

              #7
              Originally posted by Kevin
              Well, I'm not Mavs but I figure I'd share an answer I was given recently by an experienced hiker...

              1.5 miles an hour seems to work itself out for the overall trip (considering faster decents and slower ascents).
              1.5 miles an hour is what I average on a bushwhack.

              My guess is that with all the variables you have when you climb peaks: height; length of ascent; pitch; etc, it would be hard to judge unless you have done peaks initially the same with the same group of people.

              The only adage you can really rely on is that "The group is only as fast as it's slowest member".
              "If future generations are to remember us with gratitude rather than contempt, we must leave them more than the miracles of technology. We must leave them a glimpse of the world as it was in the beginning, not just after we got through with it." Lyndon B. Johnson

              Comment

              • Mavs00
                I am the sith
                • Nov 2007
                • 46

                #8
                Depends (and it's never a strict) -

                For me it's done mostly by feel, I know how fast we (as a family) hikes. So I look at mileage and elevation and then add in a few other factors. A few examples;

                On Marshall, I knew it would be about 14.5 miles / ~2600 feet. But, it was our first hike of the year, we knew we didn't have to hurry so I figured we'd do no better than 1.5 MPH. I added about 45 minutes for summit time. Figuring it all up it gave me an estimate of about 10:15 hours. It took us exactly 10:04.

                Another recent hike with just my bro (we hike a lot faster), we knew we wanted to "hard hike" UWJ/Armstrong from the AMR lot without messing around much. I figured between 2 and 2.5 MPH (2.25) over the 12 miles was resonable for us (despite elevation), plus about 1 hour of summit/rest time, which equaled 6:20 hrs. It took a 6:40 hrs.

                On Whiteface we summited within 3 minutes of when I told everyone to be there, of course we waited 10 minutes below the summit first.

                Not real scientific I know, but if you know your typical speed and are realisitc about conditioning and objectives you can be pretty acurate. I should note that despite all this wonderfull info, I've walked out under headlamp quite a few times I intended to be out before dark.

                The only adage you can really rely on is that "The group is only as fast as it's slowest member".
                You got that right hawk
                Last edited by Mavs00; 09-16-2004, 11:32 AM.
                "I can feel your anger. It gives you focus. It makes you stronger. " Supreme Chancellor

                Comment

                • Dick
                  somewhere out there...
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 2821

                  #9
                  "The group is only as fast as it's slowest member"

                  Not all groups follow this!

                  Comment

                  • Neil
                    Admin

                    • May 2004
                    • 6129

                    #10
                    Well I thought Mavs00 had a formula on his site such as : 25 min/mile plus x min/1000 elevation gain. I was trying to remember what value he had given for x. However, just to figure on 1.5 miles an hour is simplest. (Just remember to subtract .2 miles per hour from the speed for every decade the oldest member of the group is over twenty) Recently, out west I estimated purely on elevation (an hour per 1000 feet) and it was right on all the time. The hikes were all steep uphill right from start to finish so it wasn't necessary to facter in distance.
                    Last edited by Neil; 09-16-2004, 01:09 PM.
                    The best, the most successful adventurer, is the one having the most fun.

                    Comment

                    • Mavs00
                      I am the sith
                      • Nov 2007
                      • 46

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Neil
                      Well I thought Mavs00 had a formula on his site such as : 25 min/mile plus x min/1000 elevation gain. I was trying to remember what value he had given for x. However, just to figure on 1.5 miles an hour is simplest. (Just remember to subtract .2 miles per hour from the speed for every decade the oldest member of the group is over twenty) Recently, out west I estimated purely on elevation (an hour per 1000 feet) and it was right on all the time. The hikes were all steep uphill right from start to finish so it wasn't necessary to facter in distance.
                      It was/is 45 min per 1000 feet. That's straight out of the 12th Edition of the ADK trail guide (I beleive). I posted that, becaise If you've no idea of you're typical speed, it seems to be a good "rule of thumb". I used to use it, and for the most part worked okay.

                      Now, because I have a much better idea of our abilities, hiking speed and factors that could (or will) slow us down or speed us up, I use the technique I mentioned above. I find it more applicable to my situation.
                      "I can feel your anger. It gives you focus. It makes you stronger. " Supreme Chancellor

                      Comment

                      • Jeff
                        Member
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 352

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Dick
                        "The group is only as fast as it's slowest member"

                        Not all groups follow this!
                        Hmmm, has Kevin seen this one yet ?


                        I know for a fact that going in or up I ALWAYS have on my best and worst days only approximately averaged 1 mile per hour. On descents and on my way out(sometimes joyfully so ), my pace is somewhat quicker. I'm sure it's all on an individual basis

                        Comment

                        Working...