46 peaks in 23 hikes?

[AvalanchePass]

Trying to put together a plan.

46 peaks in 23 hikes came to mind. Not necessary, but seems like a nice goal.

Some research came up with these combos (listed in no particular order).

1. Cascade & Porter (done)
2. Big Slide (done)
3. Giant, Rocky Peak Ridge
4. Wright, Algonquin, Iroquois
5. Phelps, Tabletop
6. Street, Nye
7. Whiteface, Esther
8. Upper Wolfjaw, Lower Wolfjaw
9. Colvin, Blake
10. Dial, Nippletop
11. Gothics, Armstrong
12. Basin, Saddleback
13. Gray, Skylight
14. Seward, Donaldson, Emmons
15. Panther, Santanoni, Couchsachraga
16. Macomb, South Dix, Grace
17. Dix, Hough
18. Cliff, Redfield
19. Haystack
20. Marcy
21. Sawteeth
22. Allen
23. Colden
24. Marshall
25. Seymour

So that's 25 hikes. If you needed to bring it down to 23 what changes would you make?

Thanks,
AP

[Neil]

This should be a fun thread!
You can probably get it down to 15 hikes or even fewer. But, maybe that's not your goal.

[AvalanchePass]

Hi Neil,

Don't think we want to get it down below 23 hikes. Something about 23 x 2 = 46 that is appealing. It's a fun exercise regardless.

Hiking with kids (ages 8 and 9) so need to keep things reasonable. Pace wise I needed to keep up with them on Brothers / Big Slide. But from a distance perspective (9.5 miles) I sensed that they had almost had enough so don't want to do anything tremendously longer in the short term.

Physically they could have done more easily but mentally I think they were getting close to done. Things like Tenderfoot help tremendously to keep the kids engaged so I'll probably ask for some insider tips before each hike.

3 peaks "bagged" so far. Plan is for about 4 hikes a year. So at 2 peaks/hike we'll take about 5 years to finish. May be around the time the boys start to realize that Dad isn't the coolest guy in the world anyway.

[TCD]

Quick fix: Throw Arm, Goth and Saw in with upper and lower WJ. You are on the ridge already, just stay up there and keep going.

[Neil]

I would put Marcy in with Gray and Sky. You're already right there. The classic loop includes the Van Hoevenberg trail and Lake Arnold. Marcy either first or last. Check to make sure the Opalescent trail isn't flooded when you go).

[AvalanchePass]

Gray, Skylight, Marcy

Thanks. Down to 24.

Looks like 17 miles so we'll save that for a couple of years.

[AvalanchePass]

Gothics, Armstrong, Sawteeth

And that's 23.

[Hoser]

The list of 23 above almost match my approach. Question on the Dix range: What are the pros/cons of doing Hough with Dix, vs Hough with the other three, leaving Dix solo? Current plan is one day Dix from 73 (round pound TH), and a seperate unjoined second day for the other four, from the Elk Lake trailhead (once reopened, seasonal and parking challenges understand). Seems many do all 4, but others do Dix + Hough.....

[SpencerVT]

Quick fix: Throw Arm, Goth and Saw in with upper and lower WJ. You are on the ridge already, just stay up there and keep going.

That's what I did. You're already up there, it just makes sense.
It's a long day, but definitely doable. Killer views everywhere.

Another idea is to put Seymour in with Seward, Donaldson, Emmons.
Again, a long day, but it makes sense since you're already out in that area.
That's what I did and it was fine.

[DSettahr]

Overall, seems like a good list. A few suggestions:

Marcy can definitely be done with Gray and Skylight, but I'd also make sure to keep in optional. Make the decision whether to do Marcy after you've already done the first two. It doesn't seem like it should be much when you're standing at Four Corners, but it's still a substantial climb from there to the summit.

Wright/Algonguin/Iroqouis is a pretty long day, especially for kids. You might consider splitting that up (again you can make the determination during the hike if needed, just keep aware of how well everyone in the group is doing).

You could maybe add Sawteeth on to Gothics and Armstrong.

If you did them as overnights, you could maybe add Seymour on to the rest of the Sewards. And again, S/D/E is a long day for young kids, even if you use both approaches to avoid doing Seward twice.

I would maybe consider doing Grace separately, as to combine it with the others in the Dix Range means either doing a through hike, or repeating South Dix/Carson.

One final thought: You're going to need to pay attention to how well everyone is doing in your group (especially with kids) on every hike to ensure that you're not pushing anyone beyond their ability level or comfort zone. I can pretty much guarantee that at some point, you're probably going to end up not getting a peak or two on a particular trip as indicated by this plan. It's pretty much a guarantee that you're going to have to turn back before summitting at least once, somewhere along the way- it happens to pretty much everyone on the journey towards becoming a 46er.

So my best advice is that while this list can be useful for helping to plan trips, I would accept now the fact that you're likely not going to be able to stick to this exact itinerary the entire way through becoming a 46er. Trying to plan out exactly how many hikes it will take to become a 46er this early in the game is a potential recipe for disappointment (or possibly pushing yourself outside your ability level if you're not careful).

[AvalanchePass]

Thanks DSettahr, good advice.

I'm probably the kind of person that needs to hear that once in a while, I'll take it to heart.

It's the exact approach we took with Cascade/Porter. Plan was to do Cascade and Porter was optional. When we got to the junction I let the boys decide. They enthusiastically chose to add Porter. However, I insisted that we do Porter first so that it didn't seem like a "chore" after Cascade.

We'll take a similar approach to Marcy while doing Gray/Skylight when the time comes. Same for the other combos you mentioned.

So we'll have a game plan but we'll be flexible. The goal of course is to enjoy ourselves and stay safe.

[Trail Boss]

The ADK High Peaks Foundation has produced a list of 46er peaks grouped into three categories. More about it's purpose can be found here.

When choosing your next combination of peaks, I suggest you progress through each category before moving on to the next level. For example, the peaks you've done are all in the "Easy" category. The third one on your list "Giant & RPR", spans two categories. I suggest your third outing should continue with "Easy" peaks, like Phelps and Tabletop, Upper and Lower Wolf Jaw, or Street and Nye.

Easy
Cascade
Porter
Phelps
Wright
Giant
Lower Wolf Jaw
Upper Wolf Jaw
Sawteeth
Algonquin
Whiteface
Big Slide
Tabletop
Esther
Street
Nye

Moderate
Rocky Peak
Iroquois
Colvin
Blake
Colden
Dial
Nippletop
Armstrong
Saddleback
Gothics
Marcy
Macomb
Grace
S.Dix
Dix

Hard
Skylight
Gray
Marshall
Haystack
Basin
Cliff
Redfield
Hough
Santanoni
Couchsachraga
Panther
Allen
Seward
Donaldson
Emmons
Seymour

NOTE:
The peaks are NOT sorted by difficulty within each category.
Combining multiple peaks is, of course, likely to increase the overall difficulty beyond the stated category.

[AvalanchePass]

Thanks TB.

I've seen advice against saving all the tough ones for last but I think in our situation I'm going to ignore it. The boys are young and I'd like to keep it manageable for another year or two.

Brothers/Big Slide/JBL loop was a nice step up from Cascade/Porter and they handled it well. If we get to hikes that prove to be too much we'll need to start splitting up some combos or delay things for a year.

Also, we plan to bring different friends with us and introduce them to the area. We did this with Big Slide and it was a big hit. So keep it reasonable until we figure out who can handle some of the tougher hikes.

So here's the revised list.

1. Cascade & Porter (done)
2. Big Slide (done)
3. Whiteface, Esther (last, possibly meet family at summit)
4. Giant, Rocky Peak Ridge (likely a traverse)
5. Wright, Algonquin, Iroquois
6. Phelps, Tabletop
7. Street, Nye
8. Upper Wolfjaw, Lower Wolfjaw
9. Colvin, Blake
10. Dial, Nippletop
11. Gothics, Armstrong, Sawteeth
12. Basin, Saddleback
13. Gray, Skylight, Marcy
14. Seward, Donaldson, Emmons
15. Panther, Santanoni, Couchsachraga
16. Macomb, South Dix, Grace
17. Dix, Hough
18. Cliff, Redfield
19. Haystack
20. Allen
21. Colden (likely loop with Avalanche Pass)
22. Marshall
23. Seymour

Does anyone care to take a stab at rating the last 20 from easiest to most difficult?

I know difficulty is a combination of distance, elevation gain, terrain, and weather so it will be subjective. Generally, the boys seem more intimidated by distance than they do by elevation. They start shaking when I mention Allen.

We (like most people I think) prefer loops and traverses over out and backs. My wife will be travelling with us about half the time so she'll be able to facilitate the traverses.

Thanks,
AP

[Trail Boss]

Perceived difficulty is highly subjective. Let's see if there's a way to make it more objective.

For the most part, a route's perceived difficulty is a result of:

1. Distance
2. Ascent
3. Terrain
4. Weather

Let's drop "weather" and assume you'll try your best to hike on days with clement weather. What remains is:

• How long is the route?
• How much ascent is involved?
• How much of the route involves challenging terrain?

The "dimensions" of a route (distance and ascent) aren't difficult to find. I'm sure many forum members here can supply you with the raw numbers.

You'll need to add "weighting" to suit your family's needs. For example, you've indicated your sons are intimidated by distance. It's possible this factor may wane in the future (when they become more accustomed to disatnce) but let's assume, for now, it's a constant. As a result, a route with a moderate ascent but a long distance will be given more "difficulty points" than one with high ascent but short distance.

For example, many people find Giant and RPR manageable but describe Allen as challenging. Allen has much less ascent than Giant and RPR but is almost double the distance. Allen's ascent portion is along a very steep slope made more challenging by slippery patches of so-called "red slime" (iron deposits leaching out of the rock).

[DSettahr]

Everyone is obviously different in terms of their desired experience. I don't necessarily disagree with the sentiment to avoid saving all of the hardest ones for the end, but to me personally that's not as major a consideration.

More importantly (to me at least) is the advice to save a peak with spectacular scenery to be your final peak. I typically recommend saving one of the top 6 (in elevation): Marcy, Algonquin, Haystack, Skylight, Whiteface, or Dix. Any of these peaks will give you the opportunity to enjoy the scenery to its fullest potential while celebrating your completion of the 46.

I finished my regular round on Haystack and my winter round on Dix. Several friends of mine finished their regular rounds on Skylight.

I'm hesitant to rank your list in terms of exact difficulty because that's something that is super subjective. It depends not only on the terrain and the weather but also on your mental and physical health at the time of your hike. As a general rule, though, something that you can do is rank the hikes in terms of "equivalent miles." In figuring out the difficulty of a hike, one rule of thumb is that every 1,000 feet of elevation gain is equivalent to 1 mile hiked over generally level terrain, in terms of time taken and energy expended. Additionally, every 1,000 feet of steep elevation loss (anything exceeding about 5-10% or so) is also equivalent to 1 mile hiked over generally level terrain.

So for example, an out and back hike that is 4 miles one way, with 500 feet of gentle climbing, and 1,000 feet of steep climbing is (4*2) + (1,500/1,000) + (1,000/1,000) = 10.5 equivalent miles. The elevation gain and steep elevation loss have added a difficulty similar to hiking 2.5 extra miles across flat ground. This is why rugged climbs in the High Peaks are so often underestimated by beginner hikers. The distances alone may not sound like much, but the steep ups (and even the steep downs) can significantly add to the difficulty.

If you use these rules to look more closely at the routes for each hike, you can get at least somewhat of a better sense of how one hike may compare to another, given the (super important) assumption that all other aspects (weather, physical fitness, etc.) are equal, and that in reality, these factors are very likely to differ from one hike to the next.