Crampons vs. Stabilicers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gray Ghost
    46er#6729
    • Sep 2004
    • 1319

    #1

    Crampons vs. Stabilicers

    For peakbagging, what's the main difference? Obviously, crampons have more "bite" but is anyone biased toward one or the other?
    http://www.adkwildernessguide.com
  • fvrwld
    Moderator

    • Mar 2004
    • 2220

    #2
    The Stabilicers look like they would be great for ice fishing and hiking when there is not yet enough snow for snowshoes. They would probably even be good for a (not too steep) trail that is slightly iced over. For bare, iced over steep rock...like the summits of some peaks...I would say that crampons are necessary.
    “One of the penalties of an ecological education is that one lives alone in a world of wounds.” ~ Aldo Leopold

    Comment

    • Skyclimber
      SAFE CLIMBING
      • Dec 2003
      • 1086

      #3
      Originally posted by Gray Ghost
      For peakbagging, what's the main difference? Obviously, crampons have more "bite" but is anyone biased toward one or the other?
      What I understand about the difference, is when crampons are overkill but you still need something, to control yourself on the ice.
      "It is easier to become a Forty-Sixer than to be one. The art of the being is to keep one's sense of wonder after the excitement of the game is over."

      Paul Jamieson Class of '58

      Comment

      Working...