Good News for Adirondack Lakes

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cityboy
    Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 575

    #1

    Good News for Adirondack Lakes

    "Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman today announced the creation of a $400,000 grant program to fund projects aimed at restoring hundreds of lakes and streams in the Adirondacks still suffering the damages of acid rain pollution."

    About time! Most of these lakes were damaged quite awhile ago by Mid-West coal plants.
  • Commissionpoint
    Tent Pitcher
    • May 2011
    • 470

    #2
    We're back to the Rotenone plan? Interesting.
    Are you in possession of all of your marbles?

    WAIT a min-u-ete! I am the only one who gets to say "one more time"!

    Comment

    • geogymn
      • Feb 2007
      • 2053

      #3
      What would be the detriments of mixing some lime into the sand/ salt mixture that is spread on the winter roads?
      "A culture is no better than its woods." W.H. Auden

      Comment

      • chairrock
        Indian Mt.Club
        • Oct 2006
        • 2709

        #4
        Originally posted by Commissionpoint
        We're back to the Rotenone plan? Interesting.

        I believe rotenone is illegal in NYS for private consumers, causes brain/nerve damage. I guess they can get special permits tho to kill those poor trash fish.
        Be careful, don't spread invasive species!!

        When a dog runs at you,whistle for him.
        Henry David Thoreau

        CL50-#23

        Comment

        • chairrock
          Indian Mt.Club
          • Oct 2006
          • 2709

          #5
          Originally posted by geogymn
          What would be the detriments of mixing some lime into the sand/ salt mixture that is spread on the winter roads?
          I think it would be slippery...and you need to use a lot.
          Be careful, don't spread invasive species!!

          When a dog runs at you,whistle for him.
          Henry David Thoreau

          CL50-#23

          Comment

          • vtflyfish
            Brookie Addict
            • Oct 2007
            • 2649

            #6
            Originally posted by Commissionpoint
            We're back to the Rotenone plan? Interesting.
            I'm not sure I get it. Looks like the commissioner was aiming at liming ponds.

            That said, the issue of re-introduction of non-native species is a big one. Several of my favorite ponds have invasive species in them now, surely the result of people fishing with minnows. It's often the death spiral for a brookie pond.
            Oscar Wilde:Work is the curse of the drinking class

            Comment

            • TCD
              • Jan 2005
              • 2114

              #7
              I'm glad there looking again at liming some lakes. I think that will be effective, as long as we continue to control the acid coming from the midwest. The invasive species may be an even more diffficult problem.

              Comment

              • bassanglers912
                Member
                • Sep 2008
                • 216

                #8
                Originally posted by vtflyfish
                surely the result of people fishing with minnows. It's often the death spiral for a brookie pond.
                Just a quick question- If you fish with minnows, how does something that small destroy the brookie pond? Is it because they out compete the brookie for limited food?

                I think the initial thought would be that any fish used as bait would not survive the outing. Put a hook through it, and a big fish eats it. Even if it survives being impaled by a #8 Eagle Claw, wouldn't the survuival chances be low, as it is now an injured baitfish in a small pond of hungry big fish??

                I'm not trying to challenge the rules against live bait in some areas (and I never use live bait where prohibited) but just wondering about the science behind it.

                Comment

                • chairrock
                  Indian Mt.Club
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 2709

                  #9
                  Yes... they out compete the trout...I need help to explain this...
                  Be careful, don't spread invasive species!!

                  When a dog runs at you,whistle for him.
                  Henry David Thoreau

                  CL50-#23

                  Comment

                  • randomscooter
                    Native Earthling
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 1500

                    #10
                    Originally posted by bassanglers912
                    I think the initial thought would be that any fish used as bait would not survive the outing. Put a hook through it, and a big fish eats it. Even if it survives being impaled by a #8 Eagle Claw, wouldn't the survuival chances be low, as it is now an injured baitfish in a small pond of hungry big fish??
                    I believe the bigger problem is when the angler dumps whatever bait is left in the bait pail at the end of the day.
                    Scooting here and there
                    Through the woods and up the peaks
                    Random Scoots awaits (D.P.)


                    "Pushing the limits of easy."™

                    Comment

                    • vtflyfish
                      Brookie Addict
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 2649

                      #11
                      So this is a subject I'm more than a little bit passionate about. There is a long history of introducing invasive species into Adirondack ponds and lakes. All of the Adirondacks were once a brook trout monoculture, the few exceptions being where lake trout and whitefish existed. This was the case from the last ice age until the Adirondacks became a sportsmans paradise in the mid to late 1800's. In that era it was common for one guide to poison another guides ponds with Perch. The perch would rapidly out-compete the brookies and eat their eggs and young. Perch are the death knell for a brookie pond.

                      As a result of invasive species introductions 95% of the Adirondack water that was once exclusive brook trout habitat has been lost FOREVER. Recent intentional introductions of Bass cost us Little Tupper, Lila and Lows, lakes that can never be reclaimed. Ironically, Little Tupper was the ancestral home of one of my favorite heritage strains of brookie. There's better fishing for them now in ponds the DEC has reclaimed.

                      Baitfish also play havoc with a trout pond. Studies have proven (and been repeated across Eastern Canada and New England) that brookies do best in a monoculture and that baitfish disrupt the food chain. I have personally watched several productive ponds decline once minnows were introduced. That, in a nutshell, is the reason for the no baitfish regulation. Once they're established in a pond the brookie fishing WILL decline. The only way to recover from this situation is to reclaim that waterbody with Rotenone and re-stock the brookies. Not all waterbodies can be reclaimed.

                      The good news is that the DEC has done an exceptional job of reclaiming hundreds of ponds that were destroyed by invasive species. The first experiment was the St. Regis area, which was rid of Perch and other invasives in the 1950's. This was / is pioneering work and should be recognized as such.

                      Don't believe me? Read Nick Karas' book, Brook Trout. Then start reading the Unit Management Plans for all the wild forests. By then you'll be ready for some of the more technical papers, most of them out of Cornell.

                      If you ever catch someone fishing with minnows in a brookie pond it's not enough to politely suggest that they stop. Make sure all that bait is exterminated. I've confiscated minnows from people 2 times now. It resulted in a couple of ugly situations but it probably saved a couple of good ponds.

                      Rant over...
                      Oscar Wilde:Work is the curse of the drinking class

                      Comment

                      • bassanglers912
                        Member
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 216

                        #12
                        Great rant! I appreciate the information, and certainly have a better understanding of the rule.

                        Comment

                        • geogymn
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 2053

                          #13
                          Yeah, great rant. I didn't fully understand the implications of live bait until now. Any issues with using worms?
                          "A culture is no better than its woods." W.H. Auden

                          Comment

                          • WinterWarlock
                            One foot in front of the other

                            • Jan 2007
                            • 2292

                            #14
                            Originally posted by geogymn
                            Yeah, great rant. I didn't fully understand the implications of live bait until now. Any issues with using worms?
                            Isn't it true (maybe not, but I seem to recall reading it) that there are no native species of worms in the Adirondacks?
                            “Death is the only wise advisor that we have. Whenever you feel, as you always do, that everything is going wrong and you're about to be annihilated, turn to your death and ask if that is so. Your death will tell you, 'I haven't touched you yet.” Carlos Castenada

                            Comment

                            • vtflyfish
                              Brookie Addict
                              • Oct 2007
                              • 2649

                              #15
                              Originally posted by geogymn
                              Yeah, great rant. I didn't fully understand the implications of live bait until now. Any issues with using worms?
                              Worms are fine. Many a good brookie has succumbed to a Lake Clear Wabbler with a worm 18" behind.

                              While this topic is still warm, I'd like to make a couple of suggestions to brookie anglers:
                              • Fish with a single, barbless hook. It reduces mortality in the fish you release.
                              • If you find a pond that turns out really nice fish, release them. Think about it: Which fish would you rather have in the gene pool? Which would you rather catch the next time you go there? There are lots of ponds where there are tons of smaller brookies. Go there when you want a few for the frying pan and don't feel an ounce of guilt over it.
                              Oscar Wilde:Work is the curse of the drinking class

                              Comment

                              Working...